Books

Jan 27, 2007

Reading update

As a result of this Missional Leadership course my reading list has had a bit of a major update.
I've finally finished Contemplative Youth Ministry by Mark Yaconelli which is amazing and should be required reading for all youth workers. Now I've got two of Martin Robinson's books to polish off in a month (as well as a few articles from the course reader) and I've decided to re-read Kester's book, The Complex Christ (or Signs of Emergence for US readers).
There's still a few books related to research into teen spirituality which I ought to finish off too.
I'm going to have to re-order my life a bit...!

Oct 08, 2006

Dawkins - The need to believe?

An interesting review today here in the Sunday Times as Rod Liddle considers Richard Dawkins new book, "The God Delusion". Liddle has little time for Christianity, but here he reveals that he also has little time for 'evangelistic atheism' and deconstructs Dawkins argument, revealing the faith inherent in Dawkins leap from scientism to atheism.
Liddle concludes:

It is evident in the fury and passion with which Dawkins et al advance their cause: they proselytise, they evangelise, they demand our repentance and our acceptance of their own creed. I’d rather treat science as a wonderful human creation for describing the world around us — often in metaphors that have an agreeably biblical ring to them. And, at the same time, I suspect — Betjeman called it, in a lovely oxymoron, a “faint conviction” — that we do not know everything, nor ever shall, and that there is a ghost somewhere in the machine.

Jul 19, 2006

Power, gift and mission

18072006

This evening I had the house and garden to myself since my wife was out at a Deanery meeting, one son was off to Frinton with a load of mates and the other son was celebrating the end of term by going to a party in Braintree.
The perfect opportunity to sit in the garden with a beer and continue my current read, 'How (not) to speak of God' by Peter Rollins.

For those of you who haven't yet read this book (and with apologies to those of you who have) the basic premise is that the ways we sometimes speak of God can often create more problems of understanding than they solve. I'm still processing the first few chapters, and I'm not yet sure to what extent I agree with him, but I'm finding a certain resonance with many of his key points.

Today I got to chapter 3 and Peter's analysis of what he calls the 'power discourses' that can be a feature of much of our evangelism. This is where the apologetic of the word, ("this makes so much sense you'd be a fool not to believe it") or of wonder ("see the miracle and believe") can be presented in a way that is more an exercise of power than of gift. He writes:

"In this way, the acceptance or rejection of the system is based, not upon a love for the system or a feeling of overwhelming seduction by it, but rather upon the accumulation of evidence that stands secure, regardless of the motive and desires of the individual."

I'd prefer it if he replaced 'the system' with 'Christ', but I know what he's getting at (sometimes evangelism can be a bit like inviting someone into a system!)

In all of our evangelistic endeavours with young people I am acutely aware that it's too easy to overwhelm with a stark choice, a killer argument or even an irresistible emotional appeal. Peter again:

"Like a lover of nuts who is offered thousands of shells with no centre, so we offer God thousands of 'converts' with no heart."
I fear this can too often be tragically true. However, I also know people who responded to an 'appeal' but weren't quite sure afterwards what they had done and yet that decision marked the beginning of a journey of becoming Christian, a point at which their heart changed towards God.

And yet, and yet... in avoiding the excesses of coercion and in my longing that people will ask, as they did of the Apostle Peter, "What must we do to be saved", I still believe God intended for his word to be shared and spoken about, and for his Spirit to work signs and wonders to bless unbelievers and believers alike. The difference seems to be whether we do this because we have the power, or because we are offering a gift on behalf of the giver.

Jun 07, 2006

The Books the Church Suppressed

1854246984_1

If you've ever wondered, or ever been asked (as we often are in school), how we can trust what the bible says about Jesus and the early church this is the book for you. It takes you through the whole process of the formation of the New Testament and in particular deals with the (false) accusation that the bible we have today is corrupted, biased and has been altered to the point of being unreliable. Michael Green's clear demonstration of the reliability of the New Testament is easy to read, fascinating in its detail and exudes the conviction of a passionate evangelist. If you ask nicely I might lend it to you, as long as I know you and you promise to give it back...

My Photo

Subscribe to feed

Photos

  • Photos
    www.flickr.com
    timabbott's photos More of timabbott's photos

________________

  • This blog reflects my own views at the time of writing. I could change my mind. I may or may not agree with the content of any linked sites or blogs.
  • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Blog powered by TypePad